↓ Skip to main content

A comparative proteomic analysis for non‐invasive early prediction of hypoxic‐ischemic injury in asphyxiated neonates

Overview of attention for article published in PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A comparative proteomic analysis for non‐invasive early prediction of hypoxic‐ischemic injury in asphyxiated neonates
Published in
PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications, October 2023
DOI 10.1002/prca.202200054
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the principal causes of neonatal mortality and long-term morbidity worldwide. The neonatal signs of mild cerebral injury are subtle, making an early precise diagnosis difficult. Delayed detection, poor prognosis, and lack of specific biomarkers for the disease are increasing mortality rates. In this study, we intended to identify specific biomarkers using comparative proteomic analysis to predict the severity of perinatal asphyxia so that its outcome can also be prevented. A case-control study was conducted on 38 neonates, and urine samples were collected within 24 and 72 h of life. A tandem mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics approach, followed by validation via sandwich ELISA, was performed. The LC-MS/MS-based proteomics analysis resulted in the identification of 1201 proteins in urine, with 229, 244, and 426 being differentially expressed in HIE-1, HIE-2, and HIE-3, respectively. Axon guidance, Diseases of programmed cell death, and Detoxification of reactive oxygen species pathways were significantly enriched in mild HIE versus severe HIE. Among the differentially expressed proteins in various stages of HIE, we chose to validate four proteins - APP, AGT, FABP1, and FN1 - via sandwich ELISA. Individual and cumulative ROC curves were plotted. AGT and FABP1 together showed high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of HIE. Establishing putative urinary biomarkers will facilitate clinicians to more accurately screen neonates for brain injury and monitor the disease progression. Prompt treatment of neonates may reduce mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#28,811,852
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications
#741
of 1,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,575
of 392,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.