You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Habitual short sleepers with pre-existing medical conditions are at higher risk of Long COVID.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.5664/jcsm.10818 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linor Berezin, Rida Waseem, Ilona Merikanto, Christian Benedict, Brigitte Holzinger, Luigi De Gennaro, Yun Kwok Wing, Bjørn Bjorvatn, Maria Korman, Charles M Morin, Colin Espie, Anne-Marie Landtblom, Thomas Penzel, Kentaro Matsui, Harald Hrubos-Strøm, Sérgio Mota-Rolim, Michael R Nadorff, Giuseppe Plazzi, Catia Reis, Rachel Ngan Yin Chan, Ana Suely Cunha, Juliana Yordanova, Adrijana Koscec Bjelajac, Yuichi Inoue, Yves Dauvilliers, Markku Partinen, Frances Chung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 389 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 53 | 14% |
| United States | 17 | 4% |
| Canada | 12 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| Austria | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 262 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 366 | 94% |
| Scientists | 9 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 33% |
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 25% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 464. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#59,894
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
#28
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#975
of 356,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
#2
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.