↓ Skip to main content

Seroprevalence of Enterovirus D68 Infection among Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Intervirology, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seroprevalence of Enterovirus D68 Infection among Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Intervirology, October 2023
DOI 10.1159/000531853
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingying Shi, Qinqin Ran, Xiaochen Wang, Lu Shi

Abstract

Human enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), which belongs to enteroviruses of the small RNA family, is a type of enterovirus that can cause acute respiratory tract infection and central nervous system diseases. This study systematically analysed and summarized EV-D68 antibody studies in databases and identified the seropositivity rates of different regions, ages, and sexes. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 software. I2 and Q tests were used to analyse the heterogeneity of the included studies. Meta-regression analysis was performed for different groups, and Egger's linear regression analysis was used to evaluate publication bias. The results of multiple studies indicated that the serological prevalence range of EV-D68 antibody was 17.78%-96.69%. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the seropositivity rate of EV-D68 antibody was 76% (95% CI: 67%-84%), among which that of the Chinese population was 74% (95% CI: 61%-86%) and that of other countries was 79% (95% CI: 65%-91%). At the same time, a subgroup analysis was conducted. The seroprevalence of EV-D68 antibody was related to age but not sex or region. The seropositivity rate was lower in the below 5 years age group; however, it gradually increased with age. The results of this study showed that EV-D68 infection was widespread in the population, and the current clinical infection situation could not reflect the actual epidemic situation of the virus, among which children under 5 years old were vulnerable to infection, which should be given greater attention for epidemic prevention and control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#17,082,920
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from Intervirology
#539
of 676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,744
of 343,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intervirology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 676 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.