↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Inhibition of APOL1 Pore-Forming Function Prevents APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
twitter
105 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Inhibition of APOL1 Pore-Forming Function Prevents APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease
Published in
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, October 2023
DOI 10.1681/asn.0000000000000219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriana M. Hung, Victoria A. Assimon, Hua-Chang Chen, Zhihong Yu, Caitlyn Vlasschaert, Jefferson L. Triozzi, Helen Chan, Lee Wheless, Otis Wilson, Shailja C. Shah, Taralynn Mack, Trevor Thompson, Michael E. Matheny, Saranya Chandrasekar, Sahar V. Mozaffari, Cecilia P. Chung, Philip Tsao, Katalin Susztak, Edward D. Siew, Karol Estrada, J. Michael Gaziano, Robert R. Graham, Ran Tao, Maarten Hoek, Cassianne Robinson-Cohen, Eric M. Green, Alexander G. Bick, for the Million Veteran Program

Abstract

African Americans are at increased risk of CKD in part due to high-risk (HR) variants in the apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene, termed G1/G2. A different APOL1 variant, p.N264K, reduced the risk of CKD and ESKD among carriers of APOL1 HR variants to levels comparable with individuals with APOL1 low-risk variants in an analysis of 121,492 participants of African ancestry from the Million Veteran Program (MVP). Functional genetic studies in cell models showed that APOL1 p.N264K blocked APOL1 pore-forming function and ion channel conduction and reduced toxicity of APOL1 HR mutations. Pharmacologic inhibitors that mimic this mutation blocking APOL1-mediated pore formation may be able to prevent and/or treat APOL1-associated kidney disease. African Americans are at increased risk for nondiabetic CKD in part due to HR variants in the APOL1 gene. We tested whether a different APOL1 variant, p.N264K, modified the association between APOL1 HR genotypes (two copies of G1/G2) and CKD in a cross-sectional analysis of 121,492 participants of African ancestry from the MVP. We replicated our findings in the Vanderbilt University Biobank (n=14,386) and National Institutes of Health All of Us (n=14,704). Primary outcome was CKD and secondary outcome was ESKD among nondiabetic patients. Primary analysis compared APOL1 HR genotypes with and without p.N264K. Secondary analyses included APOL1 low-risk genotypes and tested for interaction. In MVP, we performed sequential logistic regression models adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, medications, and ten principal components of ancestry. Functional genomic studies expressed APOL1 HR variants with and without APOL1 p.N264K in cell models. In the MVP cohort, 15,604 (12.8%) had two APOL1 HR variants, of which 582 (0.5%) also had APOL1 p.N264K. In MVP, 18,831 (15%) had CKD, 4177 (3%) had ESKD, and 34% had diabetes. MVP APOL1 HR, without p.N264K, was associated with increased odds of CKD (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60 to 1.85) and ESKD (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 3.52 to 4.41). In MVP, APOL1 p.N264K mitigated the renal risk of APOL1 HR, in CKD (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.65) and ESKD (OR, 0.19; CI 0.07 to 0.51). In the replication cohorts meta-analysis, APOL1 p.N264K mitigated the renal risk of APOL1 HR in CKD (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.92) and ESKD (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.79). In the mechanistic studies, APOL1 p.N264K blocked APOL1 pore-forming function and ion channel conduction and reduced toxicity of APOL1 HR variants. APOL1 p.N264K is associated with reduced risk of CKD and ESKD among carriers of APOL1 HR to levels comparable with individuals with APOL1 low-risk genotypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 200. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#203,623
of 25,964,892 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
#72
of 5,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,702
of 364,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,964,892 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.