↓ Skip to main content

Field‐scale evaluation of struvite phosphorus and nitrogen leaching relative to monoammonium phosphate

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Quality, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 2,996)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field‐scale evaluation of struvite phosphorus and nitrogen leaching relative to monoammonium phosphate
Published in
Journal of Environmental Quality, November 2023
DOI 10.1002/jeq2.20522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Leon, Yuhei Nakayama, Andrew J. Margenot

Abstract

Struvite (MgNH4 PO4 ·6H2 O) is a wastewater-derived phosphorus (P) fertilizer with potential to reduce P as well as nitrogen (N) losses due its low water solubility. To test hypothesized lower P and N losses from struvite relative to monoammonium phosphate (MAP), field experiments with a randomized-complete block design were conducted at two locations, on a Endoaquoll-Argiudoll complex (Urbana, IL) and a Fragiudalf-Hapludalf complex (Ewing, IL). Fertilizer was broadcast applied in the fall prior to spring planting of soybean (Glycine max L.) at a maintenance rate of 29.5 kg P ha-1 (Urbana) and 22.0 kg P ha-1 (Ewing). In the spring, soil extractable N and Mehlich 3-P at 0-15 and 15-35 cm depths were determined, and leached N and P were estimated using fall-installed ion-exchangeable resin (IER) lysimeters. At Urbana, soil extractable nitrate-N was higher under MAP than struvite at the 0-15 cm depth. At Ewing, soil Mehlich 3-P under struvite was lower than MAP at both depths. At Urbana, leached P was 10-fold lower and leached N was 2-fold lower under struvite than MAP. Soybean yields were similar between MAP and struvite at Urbana (4.1-4.3 Mg ha-1 ) and Ewing (3.2-3.5 Mg ha-1 ), but at Ewing were 23% higher under struvite compared to the P-unfertilized control. Off-season yield-scaled P and N losses under struvite were lower than MAP by 51% at Urbana and by 10% at Ewing. Our results support the hypothesized potential of struvite to reduce nutrient losses while meeting crop P needs. Additionally, we identify disproportionally greater reductions in N leaching and yield-scaled N losses by substituting struvite for MAP in fall applications, indicating that struvite may offer greater relative benefits for N loss reductions than P loss reductions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Unspecified 2 33%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Unspecified 2 33%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#358,969
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Quality
#12
of 2,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,778
of 342,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Quality
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.