↓ Skip to main content

Methods for estimating selected low-flow frequency statistics and mean annual flow for ungaged locations on streams in North Georgia

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods for estimating selected low-flow frequency statistics and mean annual flow for ungaged locations on streams in North Georgia
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2017
DOI 10.3133/sir20175001
Authors

Gotvald, Anthony J., Anthony J. Gotvald

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,774,904
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,334
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,583
of 421,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#239
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.