You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Groundwater Level Models Based on Artificial Neural Networks and ANFIS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Scientific World Journal, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2015/742138 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nevenka Djurovic, Milka Domazet, Ruzica Stricevic, Vesna Pocuca, Velibor Spalevic, Radmila Pivic, Enika Gregoric, Uros Domazet |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Scientific World Journal
#792
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,015
of 393,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Scientific World Journal
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.