↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic Response of a Low Plasticity Silt Deposit: Comparison of In-situ and Laboratory Responses

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Geotechnical Journal, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic Response of a Low Plasticity Silt Deposit: Comparison of In-situ and Laboratory Responses
Published in
Canadian Geotechnical Journal, October 2023
DOI 10.1139/cgj-2022-0579
Authors

Ali Dadashiserej, Amalesh Jana, Zhongze Xu, Armin W. Stuedlein, T. Matthew Evans, Kenneth H. Stokoe, Brady R. Cox

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,719,840
of 24,589,002 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Geotechnical Journal
#1,099
of 1,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,880
of 183,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Geotechnical Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,589,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them