You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exceptional Early Jurassic fossils with leathery eggs shed light on dinosaur reproductive biology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
National Science Review, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1093/nsr/nwad258 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fenglu Han, Yilun Yu, Shukang Zhang, Rong Zeng, Xinjin Wang, Huiyang Cai, Tianzhuang Wu, Yingfeng Wen, Sifu Cai, Chun Li, Rui Wu, Qi Zhao, Xing Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 5% |
| Brazil | 6 | 4% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Thailand | 4 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 92 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 135 | 89% |
| Scientists | 15 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 36% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 343. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#98,164
of 25,930,295 outputs
Outputs from National Science Review
#12
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,746
of 364,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from National Science Review
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.