↓ Skip to main content

Comparision between cortico-cancellous allograft and bovine xenograft for sinus augmentation: a radiographic, histologic and histomorphometric clinical study.

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparision between cortico-cancellous allograft and bovine xenograft for sinus augmentation: a radiographic, histologic and histomorphometric clinical study.
Published in
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, October 2023
DOI 10.11607/prd.6900
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Chávarri-Prado, Andoni Jones, Esteban Pérez-Pevida, Markel Diéguez-Pereira, Alejandro Estrada-Martínez, Rodrigo Cabezón-Palacios

Abstract

Sinus floor augmentation is one of the most used approaches to obtain sufficient bone availability to place dental implants in cases with severe bone atrophy in the posterior maxilla. Several bone substitutes are indicated for sinus augmentation but they may obtain different clinical outcomes. This study aims to compare bovine bone mineral (BBM) with freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA) in two- stage lateral window sinus grafting approach. 20 patients received a lateral window sinus lift with either FDBA or BBM. Post-operative graft height was measured with a cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT). 6 months later implants were placed. Biopsies were taken for histological analysis and new CBCts were performed to measure graft height at this point. 6 months after procedure, there was a height reduction of 20,27 ± 4,94 % for the FDBA sample and 5,36 ± 2,41% for the BBM group. The histological analysis revealed a ratio of newly formed bone of 43,70 ± 5,29% for the FDBA and 38,11 ± 4,03% for the BBM group. The FDBA also showed a higher amount of residual biomaterial 17,25 ± 10,10% and connective tissue 14,63 ± 4,38% compared to the BBM 15,53 ± 5,42% and 13,11 ± 4,42%. The differences between groups were statistically significant for the height reduction and for the newly formed bone (p ≤ 0.05) but not for the residual biomaterial amount and the non-mineralized connective tissue (p ≥ 0.05). It could be concluded that the percentage of newly formed bone 6 months after performing a lateral window sinus lift using FDBA was significantly higher than when using BBM, although the graft height reduction was also significantly higher for the FDBA group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 75%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 75%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
#98
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,726
of 354,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them