You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prolonged platelet hyperactivity after COVID‐19 infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Haematology, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/bjh.19125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noriko Nara, Mie Shimizu, Masahiro Yamamoto, Tomoki Nakamizo, Azusa Hayakawa, Ken Johkura |
| Abstract |
Platelet hyperactivity often occurs in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, it remains unclear how long platelet hyperactivity lasts after the acute phase, owing to a lack of follow-up studies. To elucidate the course of platelet hyperactivity, we serially measured platelet activity in patients with COVID-19 up to 40 days after hospital admission using an easily assessable haematology analyser that semi-quantitates platelet clumps on a scattergram. Our results showed that platelet hyperactivity persisted for at least 40 days even after acute inflammation subsided in most patients with COVID-19, regardless of disease severity. Persistent platelet hyperactivity may contribute to thromboembolic complications in post-COVID-19 patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 180 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 9% |
| Spain | 11 | 6% |
| Germany | 7 | 4% |
| Japan | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 111 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 162 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 4% |
| Scientists | 5 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 40% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 2 | 40% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#452,830
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#47
of 8,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,153
of 360,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#1
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.