↓ Skip to main content

Tales of science and defiance: the case for co-learning and collaboration in bridging the science/emotion divide in water recycling debates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tales of science and defiance: the case for co-learning and collaboration in bridging the science/emotion divide in water recycling debates
Published in
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, October 2014
DOI 10.1080/09640568.2014.954691
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 28%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 21%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Engineering 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#9,400,890
of 27,410,029 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
#328
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,364
of 270,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,410,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.