↓ Skip to main content

Quadriceps weakness and osteoarthritis of the knee.

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, July 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
516 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quadriceps weakness and osteoarthritis of the knee.
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, July 1997
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-127-2-199707150-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The quadriceps weakness commonly associated with osteoarthritis of the knee is widely believed to result from disuse atrophy secondary to pain in the involved joint. However, quadriceps weakness may be an etiologic factor in the development of osteoarthritis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 516 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 504 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 14%
Student > Master 68 13%
Student > Bachelor 55 11%
Researcher 42 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Other 98 19%
Unknown 144 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 9%
Sports and Recreations 40 8%
Engineering 33 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 4%
Other 48 9%
Unknown 186 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2026.
All research outputs
#5,897,333
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#8,406
of 16,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,272
of 41,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#31
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.