↓ Skip to main content

医薬品情報を利活用したがん薬物療法に対する薬学的介入 ―タクロリムスとアプレピタントの薬物相互作用に着目し薬学的支援を行った皮膚筋炎併発胃がんの 1 例―

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 123)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
医薬品情報を利活用したがん薬物療法に対する薬学的介入 ―タクロリムスとアプレピタントの薬物相互作用に着目し薬学的支援を行った皮膚筋炎併発胃がんの 1 例―
Published in
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, September 2023
DOI 10.11256/jjdi.25.83
Authors

川上 恵, 北田 徳昭, 米澤 淳, 岡村 みや子, 尾崎 淳子, 池見 泰明, 中川 俊作, 今井 哲司, 中川 貴之, 土井 恵太郎, 秋月 修治, 武藤 学, 寺田 智祐

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,378,579
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#22
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,953
of 355,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them