You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A scoping review of equity-focused implementation theories, models and frameworks in healthcare and their application in addressing ethnicity-related health inequities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-023-01304-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Papillon Gustafson, Yasmin Abdul Aziz, Michelle Lambert, Karen Bartholomew, Nicole Rankin, Adam Fusheini, Rachel Brown, Peter Carswell, Mihi Ratima, Patricia Priest, Sue Crengle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 10% |
| Canada | 8 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 49 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 35 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#701,773
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#62
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,565
of 365,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.