| Title |
Genome-Wide Comparison of Medieval and Modern Mycobacterium leprae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1238286 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Verena J. Schuenemann, Pushpendra Singh, Thomas A. Mendum, Ben Krause-Kyora, Günter Jäger, Kirsten I. Bos, Alexander Herbig, Christos Economou, Andrej Benjak, Philippe Busso, Almut Nebel, Jesper L. Boldsen, Anna Kjellström, Huihai Wu, Graham R. Stewart, G. Michael Taylor, Peter Bauer, Oona Y.-C. Lee, Houdini H.T. Wu, David E. Minnikin, Gurdyal S. Besra, Katie Tucker, Simon Roffey, Samba O. Sow, Stewart T. Cole, Kay Nieselt, Johannes Krause |
| Abstract |
Leprosy was endemic in Europe until the Middle Ages. Using DNA array capture, we have obtained genome sequences of Mycobacterium leprae from skeletons of five medieval leprosy cases from the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Denmark. In one case, the DNA was so well preserved that full de novo assembly of the ancient bacterial genome could be achieved through shotgun sequencing alone. The ancient M. leprae sequences were compared with those of 11 modern strains, representing diverse genotypes and geographic origins. The comparisons revealed remarkable genomic conservation during the past 1000 years, a European origin for leprosy in the Americas, and the presence of an M. leprae genotype in medieval Europe now commonly associated with the Middle East. The exceptional preservation of M. leprae biomarkers, both DNA and mycolic acids, in ancient skeletons has major implications for palaeomicrobiology and human pathogen evolution. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 17% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 69% |
| Scientists | 21 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 430 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 89 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 87 | 19% |
| Unknown | 69 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 152 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 97 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 85 | 19% |