↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Comparison of Medieval and Modern Mycobacterium leprae

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
90 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
455 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genome-Wide Comparison of Medieval and Modern Mycobacterium leprae
Published in
Science, June 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1238286
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Leprosy was endemic in Europe until the Middle Ages. Using DNA array capture, we have obtained genome sequences of Mycobacterium leprae from skeletons of five medieval leprosy cases from the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Denmark. In one case, the DNA was so well preserved that full de novo assembly of the ancient bacterial genome could be achieved through shotgun sequencing alone. The ancient M. leprae sequences were compared with those of 11 modern strains, representing diverse genotypes and geographic origins. The comparisons revealed remarkable genomic conservation during the past 1000 years, a European origin for leprosy in the Americas, and the presence of an M. leprae genotype in medieval Europe now commonly associated with the Middle East. The exceptional preservation of M. leprae biomarkers, both DNA and mycolic acids, in ancient skeletons has major implications for palaeomicrobiology and human pathogen evolution.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Germany 6 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 430 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 89 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 17%
Student > Master 50 11%
Student > Bachelor 47 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 7%
Other 87 19%
Unknown 69 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 97 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 5%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 85 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 313. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2026.
All research outputs
#137,682
of 34,348,536 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,086
of 93,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#739
of 244,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#32
of 816 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,348,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 816 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.