↓ Skip to main content

The Anatomy and Biomechanics of Acute and Chronic Whiplash Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Traffic Injury Prevention, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Anatomy and Biomechanics of Acute and Chronic Whiplash Injury
Published in
Traffic Injury Prevention, March 2009
DOI 10.1080/15389580802593269
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Whiplash injury is the most common motor vehicle injury, yet it is also one of the most poorly understood. Here we examine the evidence supporting an organic basis for acute and chronic whiplash injuries and review the anatomical sites within the neck that are potentially injured during these collisions. For each proposed anatomical site--facet joints, spinal ligaments, intervertebral discs, vertebral arteries, dorsal root ganglia, and neck muscles--we present the clinical evidence supporting that injury site, its relevant anatomy, the mechanism of and tolerance to injury, and the future research needed to determine whether that site is responsible for some whiplash injuries. This article serves as a snapshot of the current state of whiplash biomechanics research and provides a roadmap for future research to better understand and ultimately prevent whiplash injuries.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 231 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Other 21 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 65 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 52 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,544,533
of 34,675,792 outputs
Outputs from Traffic Injury Prevention
#174
of 1,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,551
of 151,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Traffic Injury Prevention
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,675,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.