↓ Skip to main content

Acute rheumatic fever and exposure to poor housing conditions in New Zealand: A descriptive study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Acute rheumatic fever and exposure to poor housing conditions in New Zealand: A descriptive study
Published in
Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health, January 2017
DOI 10.1111/jpc.13421
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) is an important public health problem in low- and middle-income countries and in certain populations in high-income countries. Indigenous Australians, and New Zealand Māori and Pacific people, have incidence rates among the highest in the world. We aimed to investigate ARF cases' housing conditions and sore throat treatment to identify opportunities for improving ARF prevention in New Zealand. Recently diagnosed cases and their care givers were interviewed. Information was obtained about the cases' demographics, housing circumstances and conditions, and sore throat treatment preceding ARF. We interviewed 55 cases. Most (75%) lived in rental housing and reported multiple measures of deprivation. Common exposures were household crowding (58%), bed-sharing (49%), dampness and mould (76%), cold (82%) and co-habiting with smokers (71%). Experiencing sore throat in the weeks before ARF was recalled by 62%, with 29% seeing a doctor or nurse and 13% of the total sample receiving antibiotics. The environmental conditions reported could contribute to high group A Streptococcus transmission and susceptibility to infection, thus increasing ARF risk. Sore throat treatment has important limitations as an intervention, particularly as 38% of participants did not recall sore throat preceding the diagnosis. The results support the need to improve rental housing. Interventions promoting minimum enforceable standards in social housing and private rental sectors (such as a housing warrant of fitness) could support these changes. A rigorous investigation, such as a case control study, is needed to explore risk factors further.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 55 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Engineering 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 58 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2025.
All research outputs
#1,688,259
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#153
of 3,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,042
of 464,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#7
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.