↓ Skip to main content

The effect of general practice team composition and climate on staff and patient experiences: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
The effect of general practice team composition and climate on staff and patient experiences: A systematic review
Published in
BJGP Open, October 2023
DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2023.0111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Abrams, Bridget Jones, John Campbell, Simon de Lusignan, Stephen Peckham, Heather Gage

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,796,133
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#186
of 632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,645
of 353,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.