↓ Skip to main content

Parallel Neural Pathways Mediate CO2 Avoidance Responses in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Parallel Neural Pathways Mediate CO2 Avoidance Responses in Drosophila
Published in
Science, June 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1236693
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Different stimulus intensities elicit distinct perceptions, implying that input signals are either conveyed through an overlapping but distinct subpopulation of sensory neurons or channeled into divergent brain circuits according to intensity. In Drosophila, carbon dioxide (CO2) is detected by a single type of olfactory sensory neuron, but information is conveyed to higher brain centers through second-order projection neurons (PNs). Two distinct pathways, PN(v)-1 and PN(v)-2, are necessary and sufficient for avoidance responses to low and high CO2 concentrations, respectively. Whereas low concentrations activate PN(v)-1, high concentrations activate both PN(v)s and GABAergic PN(v)-3, which may inhibit PN(v)-1 pathway-mediated avoidance behavior. Channeling a sensory input into distinct neural pathways allows the perception of an odor to be further modulated by both stimulus intensity and context.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 180 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 33%
Researcher 47 24%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Master 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 56%
Neuroscience 49 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 15 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,515,276
of 34,837,489 outputs
Outputs from Science
#50,027
of 94,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,296
of 246,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#481
of 818 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,837,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 818 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.