↓ Skip to main content

Neurotoxicity in Preclinical Models of Occupational Exposure to Organophosphorus Compounds

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neurotoxicity in Preclinical Models of Occupational Exposure to Organophosphorus Compounds
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2016.00590
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Organophosphorus (OPs) compounds are widely used as insecticides, plasticizers, and fuel additives. These compounds potently inhibit acetylcholinesterase (AChE), the enzyme that inactivates acetylcholine at neuronal synapses, and acute exposure to high OP levels can cause cholinergic crisis in humans and animals. Evidence further suggests that repeated exposure to lower OP levels insufficient to cause cholinergic crisis, frequently encountered in the occupational setting, also pose serious risks to people. For example, multiple epidemiological studies have identified associations between occupational OP exposure and neurodegenerative disease, psychiatric illness, and sensorimotor deficits. Rigorous scientific investigation of the basic science mechanisms underlying these epidemiological findings requires valid preclinical models in which tightly-regulated exposure paradigms can be correlated with neurotoxicity. Here, we review the experimental models of occupational OP exposure currently used in the field. We found that animal studies simulating occupational OP exposures do indeed show evidence of neurotoxicity, and that utilization of these models is helping illuminate the mechanisms underlying OP-induced neurological sequelae. Still, further work is necessary to evaluate exposure levels, protection methods, and treatment strategies, which taken together could serve to modify guidelines for improving workplace conditions globally.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 45 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 61 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,559,761
of 29,043,514 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,113
of 12,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,234
of 431,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#47
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,043,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.