You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
一灯点滅式信号機の撤去に関する住民賛否意識の分析
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of The City Planning Institute of Japan, Kansai Branch, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.11361/cpijkansai.21.0_109 |
| Authors |
原杏 希子, 塩見 康博 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#15,856,329
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of The City Planning Institute of Japan, Kansai Branch
#8
of 18 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,660
of 366,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of The City Planning Institute of Japan, Kansai Branch
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them