You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Electoral backsliding? Democratic divergence and trajectories in the quality of elections worldwide
|
---|---|
Published in |
Electoral Studies, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102696 |
Authors |
Holly Ann Garnett, Toby S. James |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 14 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 11 | 9% |
United States | 5 | 4% |
Canada | 4 | 3% |
India | 4 | 3% |
Pakistan | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Uganda | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 57 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 80 | 68% |
Scientists | 33 | 28% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 22% |
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#476,457
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Electoral Studies
#51
of 1,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,726
of 366,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electoral Studies
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.