↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of the cancer niche during multistage carcinogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cancer, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
554 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The evolution of the cancer niche during multistage carcinogenesis
Published in
Nature Reviews Cancer, June 2013
DOI 10.1038/nrc3536
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The concept of the tumour microenvironment recognizes that the interplay between cancer cells and stromal cells is a crucial determinant of cancer growth. In this Perspectives article, we propose the novel concept that the tumour microenvironment is built through rate-limiting steps during multistage carcinogenesis. Construction of a 'precancer niche' is a necessary and early step that is required for initiated cells to survive and evolve; subsequent niche expansion and maturation accompany tumour promotion and progression, respectively. As such, cancer niches represent an emergent property of a tumour that could be a robust target for cancer prevention and therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 554 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 11 2%
Unknown 520 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 24%
Researcher 108 19%
Student > Master 72 13%
Student > Bachelor 44 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 5%
Other 86 16%
Unknown 80 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 180 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 106 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 15%
Engineering 23 4%
Chemistry 15 3%
Other 59 11%
Unknown 89 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2016.
All research outputs
#5,000,272
of 34,388,610 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#1,358
of 2,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,271
of 244,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,388,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.