↓ Skip to main content

Two-year recall for people with no diabetic retinopathy: a multi-ethnic population-based retrospective cohort study using real-world data to quantify the effect

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Ophthalmology, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 6,085)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
88 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two-year recall for people with no diabetic retinopathy: a multi-ethnic population-based retrospective cohort study using real-world data to quantify the effect
Published in
British Journal of Ophthalmology, October 2023
DOI 10.1136/bjo-2023-324097
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abraham Olvera-Barrios, Alicja R Rudnicka, John Anderson, Louis Bolter, Ryan Chambers, Alasdair N Warwick, Roshan Welikala, Jiri Fajtl, Sarah Barman, Paolo Remgnino, Yue Wu, Aaron Y Lee, Emily Y Chew, Frederick L Ferris, Aroon Hingorani, Reecha Sofat, Catherine A. Egan, Adnan Tufail, Christopher G Owen, On behalf of the ARIAS Research Group, John Anderson, Sarah Barman, Louis Bolter, Ryan Chambers, Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, Umar Chaudhry, Emily Y Chew, Catherine Egan, Jiri Fajtl, Frederick L Ferris, Aroon D Hingorani, Aaron Y Lee, Abraham Olvera-Barrios, Christopher G Owen, Paolo Remagnino, Alicja R Rudnicka, Royce Shakespeare, Reecha Sofat, Adnan Tufail, Alasdair N Warwick, Charlotte Wahlich, Roshan Welikala, Kathryn Willis, Yue Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#268,101
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#41
of 6,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,638
of 363,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#2
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.