You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterization of biodegradable corn starch-based foam container incorporating kimchi cabbage (Brassica rapa L. pekinensis) by-product
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
LWT - Food Science & Technology, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115432 |
| Authors |
Suk-Min Yun, Miran Kang, So Yoon Park, Jong-Bang Eun, Ho Hyun Chun |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 20% |
| Professor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 5% |
| Design | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,374,136
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from LWT - Food Science & Technology
#232
of 2,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,373
of 354,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from LWT - Food Science & Technology
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,464 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.