↓ Skip to main content

From Bacteria to Whales: Using Functional Size Spectra to Model Marine Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
77 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
From Bacteria to Whales: Using Functional Size Spectra to Model Marine Ecosystems
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Size-based ecosystem modeling is emerging as a powerful way to assess ecosystem-level impacts of human- and environment-driven changes from individual-level processes. These models have evolved as mechanistic explanations for observed regular patterns of abundance across the marine size spectrum hypothesized to hold from bacteria to whales. Fifty years since the first size spectrum measurements, we ask how far have we come? Although recent modeling studies capture an impressive range of sizes, complexity, and real-world applications, ecosystem coverage is still only partial. We describe how this can be overcome by unifying functional traits with size spectra (which we call functional size spectra) and highlight the key knowledge gaps that need to be filled to model ecosystems from bacteria to whales.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 388 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 71 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 17%
Student > Master 49 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Student > Bachelor 21 5%
Other 75 19%
Unknown 92 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 34%
Environmental Science 91 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 12 3%
Unknown 122 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#872,428
of 32,452,905 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#463
of 3,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,643
of 452,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,452,905 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.