You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘Not a heap of stones’: material environments and ontological security in international relations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1080/09557571.2016.1271310 |
| Authors |
Filip Ejdus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Serbia | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2 | 18% |
| Germany | 2 | 18% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 26 | 46% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,069,475
of 25,504,429 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#106
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,432
of 421,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,504,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.