You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The art of gathering: histories of international scientific conferences
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal for the History of Science, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.1017/s0007087423000638 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charlotte Bigg, Jessica Reinisch, Geert Somsen, Sven Widmalm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
Japan | 2 | 6% |
Germany | 2 | 6% |
Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
Philippines | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Peru | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 17 | 55% |
Members of the public | 13 | 42% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,832,186
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from British Journal for the History of Science
#28
of 816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,797
of 367,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal for the History of Science
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.