↓ Skip to main content

急性胆囊炎に対する経乳頭的胆囊ドレナージの手技と工夫

Overview of attention for article published in GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 148)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
急性胆囊炎に対する経乳頭的胆囊ドレナージの手技と工夫
Published in
GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, October 2023
DOI 10.11280/gee.65.2217
Authors

中原 一有, 立石 敬介

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,475,396
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY
#23
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,167
of 364,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them