↓ Skip to main content

Area Studies in Dyscrasia

Overview of attention for article published in The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association, January 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 230)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Area Studies in Dyscrasia
Published in
The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association, January 1986
DOI 10.7218/nenpouseijigaku1953.37.0_1
Authors

S. Yamakage

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,680,483
of 25,939,391 outputs
Outputs from The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association
#6
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#426
of 42,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,939,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them