You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Edentulism among diabetic patients compared to non‐diabetic controls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Dental Hygiene, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/idh.12762 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Žiūkaitė, Lotte P M Weijdijk, Jennifer Tang, Dagmar Else Slot, G A Fridus van der Weijden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,511,551
of 25,424,630 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Dental Hygiene
#116
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,359
of 358,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Dental Hygiene
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,424,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them