↓ Skip to main content

Racial and ethnic differences in the polycystic ovary syndrome metabolic phenotype

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
30 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Racial and ethnic differences in the polycystic ovary syndrome metabolic phenotype
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome have a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Blacks and Hispanics have a high morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus in the general population. Since metabolic syndrome is a risk factor for development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, understanding any racial and ethnic differences in metabolic syndrome amongst women with polycystic ovarian syndrome is important for prevention strategies. However, data regarding racial/ethnic differences in metabolic phenotype amongst women with polycystic ovary syndrome is inconsistent. To determine if there are racial/ethnic differences in insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and hyperandrogenemia in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Secondary data analysis of a prospective multicenter, double blind controlled clinical trial, the Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome II study, conducted in 11 academic health centers. Data on 702 women with polycystic ovarian syndrome aged 18-40 years who met modified Rotterdam criteria for the syndrome and wished to conceive were included in the study. Women were grouped into racial/ethnic categories: Non-Hispanic Whites , non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanic. The main outcomes were the prevalence of insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and hyperandrogenemia in the different racial/ethnic groups. BMI (35.1 ± 9.8 vs. 35.7 ± 7.9 vs. 36.4 ± 7.9 kg/m(2)) and waist circumference (106.5 ± 21.6 vs. 104.9 ± 16.4 vs. 108.7 ± 7.3 cm) did not differ significantly between non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women. Hispanic women with PCOS had a significantly higher prevalence of hirsutism (93.8 vs. 86.8%), abnormal free androgen index (FAI) (75.8 vs. 56.5%), abnormal homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) (52.3 vs. 38.4%) and hyperglycemia (14.8 vs. 6.5%), as well as lower sex hormone binding globulin compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Non-Hispanic Black women had a significantly lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome (24.5 vs. 42.2%) compared with Hispanic women, and lower serum triglyceride levels compared to both Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites (85.7 ± 37.3 vs. 130.2 ± 57.0 vs. 120.1 ± 60.5 vs. mg/dL, p<0.01), with a markedly lower prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia (5.1 vs. 28.3 vs. 30.5%, p<0.01) compared to the other two groups. Hispanic women with PCOS have the most severe phenotype, both in terms of hyperandrogenism and metabolic criteria. Non-Hispanic Black women have an overall milder polycystic ovarian syndrome phenotype than Hispanics and in some respects, than Non-Hispanic White women.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 321 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 139 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 6%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 148 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2026.
All research outputs
#746,295
of 34,622,316 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#609
of 17,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,070
of 467,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#17
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,622,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.