↓ Skip to main content

Frequency of Use of Alcohol-Based Hand Rubs by Nurses: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Frequency of Use of Alcohol-Based Hand Rubs by Nurses: A Systematic Review
Published in
Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), November 2016
DOI 10.1017/ice.2016.247
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

BACKGROUND Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration requested that a "maximal use" trial be conducted to ensure the safety of frequent use of alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) by healthcare workers. OBJECTIVE To establish how frequently volunteers should be exposed to ABHR during a maximal use trial. DESIGN Retrospective review of literature and analysis of 2 recent studies that utilized hand hygiene electronic compliance monitoring (ECM) systems. METHODS We reviewed PubMed for articles published between 1970 and December 31, 2015, containing the terms hand washing, hand hygiene, hand hygiene compliance, and alcohol-based hand rubs. Article titles, abstracts, or text were reviewed to determine whether the frequency of ABHR use by healthcare workers was reported. Two studies using hand hygiene ECM systems were reviewed to determine how frequently nurses used ABHR per shift and per hour. RESULTS Of 3,487 citations reviewed, only 10 reported how frequently individual healthcare workers used ABHR per shift or per hour. Very conservative estimates of the frequency of ABHR use were reported owing to shortcomings of the methods utilized. The greatest frequency of ABHR use was recorded by an ECM system in a medical intensive care unit. In 95% of nursing shifts, individual nurses used ABHR 141 times or less per shift, and 15 times or less per hour. CONCLUSIONS Hand hygiene ECM systems established that the frequency of exposure to ABHRs varies substantially among nurses. Our findings should be useful in designing how frequently individuals should be exposed to ABHR during a maximal use trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-7.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Librarian 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 24 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 25 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2017.
All research outputs
#28,603,920
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#5,667
of 6,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,441
of 338,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#50
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.