You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Paediatric intensive care admissions of preterm children born <32 weeks gestation: a national retrospective cohort study using data linkage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325970 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim J van Hasselt, Chris Gale, Cheryl Battersby, Peter J Davis, Elizabeth Draper, Sarah E Seaton, On behalf of the United Kingdom Neonatal Collaborative and the Paediatric Critical Care Society Study Group, Matthew Babirecki, Rebecca Kettle, Anand Kamalanathan, Clare Cane, Kavi Aucharaz, Rathod Poorva, Maninder Bal, L M Wong, Anita Mittal, Penny Broggio, Pinki Surana, Matt Nash, Sam Wallis, Ahmed Hassan, Karin Schwarz, Shu-Ling Chuang, Penelope Young, Ramona Onita, Mani Kandasamy, Stephen Brearey, Morris Siramhatia, Yee Aung, Bharath Gowda, Mehdi Garbash, Alex Allwood, Pauline Adiotomre, Nigel Brooke, Claire Hollinsworh, Toria Klutse, Sonia Spathis, Sathish Krishnan, Samar Sen, Alaa Ghoneem, Jennifer Holman, Daniel Dogar, Girish Gowda, Karen Turnock, Sobia Balal, Cath Seagrave, Tristan Bate, Hilary Dixon, Narendra Aladangady, Hassan Gaili, Matthew James, M Lal, Oluseun Tayo, Abraham Isaac, Carolina Zorro, Dhaval Dave, Jonathan Filkin, Savi Sivashankar, Hannah Shore, Jo Behrsin, Jo Behrsin, Michael Grosdenier, Ruchika Gupta, Ather Ahmed, Alison Bedford Russell, Jennifer Birch, Surendran Chandrasekaran, Ashok Karupaiah, Ghada Ramadan, I Misra, Chris Knight, Richard Heaver, Mohammad Alam, Prakash Thiagarajan, Tiziana Fragapane Muthukumar, Bivan Saha, Cheentan Singh, Nick Barnes, Sangeeta Tiwary, Richard Nicholl, Dush Batra, Dush Batra, Victoria Nesbitt, Amit Gupta, Katharine McDevitt, Ruchika Gupta, David Gibson, Peter Mcewan, Sanath Reddy, Mark Johnson, Aesha Mohammedi, Patrica Cowley, Rashmi Gandhi, Charlotte Groves, Lidia Tyszcuzk, Shilpa Ramesh, Salamatu Jalloh, Julia Croft, Bushra Abdul-Malik, Dominic Muogbo, Ambalika Das, Khalid Mannan, Rajiv Chaudhary, Soma Sengupta, Christos Zipitis, Kemy Naidoo, Archana Mishra, Chris Warren, Nigel Ruggins, Chrissie Oliver, Lucinda Winckworth, Joanne Fedee, Anitha Vayalakkad, Richa Gupta, Lee Abbott, Aesha Mohammedi Ben, Rebecca Winterson, Naveen Athiraman, Anjali Pektar, Jim Baird, Adedayo Owoeye, Umapathee Majuran, Richard Lindley, Vineet Gupta, Faith Emery, Donovan Duffy, Salim Yasin, Hannah Shore, Akinsola Ogundiya, Lidia Tyszcuzk, Ngozi Edi-Osagie, Pamela Cairns, Vennila Ponnusamy, Victoria Sharp, Carrie Heal, Sanjay Salgia, Imran Ahmed, Helen Purves, Porus Bastani, Eleanor Bond, Divyen Shah, Esther Morris, Se-Yeon Park, Giles Kendall, Puneet Nath, Igor Fierens, Mehdi Garbash, Hari Kumar, Peter Curtis, Delyth Webb, Sankara Narayanan Bird, Yee Aung, Eleanor Hulse, Tayyaba Aamir, Angela Yannoulias, Caroline Sullivan, Ros Garr, Wynne Leith, Shaveta Mulla, Anna Gregory, Edward Yates, Abijeet Godhamgaonkar, Megan Eaton, Sundeep Sandhu, Arun Ramachandran, Abby Parish, Anitha James, Ian Barnard, Artur Abelian, Shakir Saeed, Nitin Goel, David Deekollu, Prem Pitchaikani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 36 | 47% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 20% |
| Scientists | 12 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
| Psychology | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#866,087
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#56
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,139
of 366,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.