You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The LANDSUPPORT geospatial decision support system (S‐DSS) vision: Operational tools to implement sustainability policies in land planning and management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Land Degradation & Development, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ldr.4954 |
| Authors |
Fabio Terribile, Marco Acutis, Antonella Agrillo, Erlisiana Anzalone, Sayed Azam‐Ali, Marialaura Bancheri, Peter Baumann, Barbara Birli, Antonello Bonfante, Marco Botta, Federica Cavaliere, Marco Colandrea, Amedeo D'Antonio, Roberto De Mascellis, Carlo De Michele, Gloria De Paoli, Camilla Della Monica, Marco Di Leginio, Mitja Ferlan, Giuliano Ferraro, Anca Florea, Tamás Hermann, Heike Hoenig, Ebrahim Jahanshiri, Jernej Jevšenak, Veronika Kárpáti, Giuliano Langella, Quang Bao Le, Daniele Lezzi, Harald Loishandl, Sarah Loudin, Piero Manna, Gina Marano, Luigi Marotta, Vlad Merticariu, Florindo Antonio Mileti, Luciana Minieri, Dimitar Misev, Luca Montanarella, Michele Munafò, Martin Neuwirth, Nadia Orefice, Imre Pácsonyi, Panos Panagos, Alessia Perego, Bang Pham Huu, Francesco Pinto, Kathrin Prebeck, Angela Puig, Judit Pump, Calogero Schillaci, Primož Simončič, Mitja Skudnik, Petra Stankovics, Gergely Tóth, Peter Tramberend, Simona Vingiani, Francesco Vuolo, Claudio Zucca, Angelo Basile |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,592,483
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Land Degradation & Development
#72
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,452
of 360,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Land Degradation & Development
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.