↓ Skip to main content

Decoding the molecular interplay in the central dogma: An overview of mass spectrometry‐based methods to investigate protein‐metabolite interactions

Overview of attention for article published in PROTEOMICS, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decoding the molecular interplay in the central dogma: An overview of mass spectrometry‐based methods to investigate protein‐metabolite interactions
Published in
PROTEOMICS, November 2023
DOI 10.1002/pmic.202200533
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Stincone, Amira Naimi, Anthony J. Saviola, Raphael Reher, Daniel Petras

Abstract

With the emergence of next-generation nucleotide sequencing and mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics tools, we have comprehensive and scalable methods to analyze the genes, transcripts, proteins, and metabolites of a multitude of biological systems. Despite the fascinating new molecular insights at the genome, transcriptome, proteome and metabolome scale, we are still far from fully understanding cellular organization, cell cycles and biology at the molecular level. Significant advances in sensitivity and depth for both sequencing as well as mass spectrometry-based methods allow the analysis at the single cell and single molecule level. At the same time, new tools are emerging that enable the investigation of molecular interactions throughout the central dogma of molecular biology. In this review, we provide an overview of established and recently developed mass spectrometry-based tools to probe metabolite-protein interactions-from individual interaction pairs to interactions at the proteome-metabolome scale. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Mathematics 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,798,507
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from PROTEOMICS
#55
of 4,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,719
of 357,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PROTEOMICS
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,068 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.