↓ Skip to main content

Redescription of Axine belones Abildgaard, 1794 (Monogenea, Axinidae), a gill parasite of Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1760) (Teleostei, Belonidae) off the Algerian coast, Western Mediterranean

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Adriatica, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Redescription of Axine belones Abildgaard, 1794 (Monogenea, Axinidae), a gill parasite of Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1760) (Teleostei, Belonidae) off the Algerian coast, Western Mediterranean
Published in
Acta Adriatica, December 2023
DOI 10.32582/aa.64.2.8
Authors

Chahinez Bouguerche, Jean-Lou Justine, Zouhour El Mouna Ayadi, Fadila Tazerouti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,970,624
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Acta Adriatica
#2
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,659
of 348,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Adriatica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them