You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the safety of new germicidal far‐UVC technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Photochemistry & Photobiology, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/php.13866 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maximilian Görlitz, Lennart Justen, Patrick J. Rochette, Manuela Buonanno, David Welch, Norman J. Kleiman, Ewan Eadie, Sachiko Kaidzu, William J. Bradshaw, Emilia Javorsky, Nigel Cridland, Anat Galor, Martin Guttmann, Martina C. Meinke, Johannes Schleusener, Paul Jensen, Per Söderberg, Nozomi Yamano, Chikako Nishigori, Paul O'Mahoney, Dieter Manstein, Rodney Croft, Curtis Cole, Frank R. de Gruijl, Paul Donald Forbes, Stephen Trokel, John Marshall, David J. Brenner, David Sliney, Kevin Esvelt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 14% |
| United States | 8 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Belize | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 88% |
| Scientists | 8 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 33% |
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 29% |
| Engineering | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#979,189
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Photochemistry & Photobiology
#38
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,899
of 366,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photochemistry & Photobiology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.