↓ Skip to main content

爪痕調査と捕獲記録の分析に基づく狭山丘陵のアライグマ生息状況の評価

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife and Human Society, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
爪痕調査と捕獲記録の分析に基づく狭山丘陵のアライグマ生息状況の評価
Published in
Wildlife and Human Society, October 2023
DOI 10.20798/awhswhs.11.0_73
Authors

渡邉 英之

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,032,945
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife and Human Society
#7
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,712
of 366,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife and Human Society
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.