↓ Skip to main content

内藤記念くすり博物館の資料および図書の収集・保存・活用

Overview of attention for article published in Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
内藤記念くすり博物館の資料および図書の収集・保存・活用
Published in
Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy, July 2020
DOI 10.34531/jjhp.53.2_85
Authors

稲垣 裕美

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy
#16
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,620
of 430,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.