↓ Skip to main content

Atypical pneumonia—time to breathe new life into a useful term?

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Atypical pneumonia—time to breathe new life into a useful term?
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, July 2009
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(09)70148-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 2 5%
Japan 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Costa Rica 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 25%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2025.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#6,022
of 7,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,082
of 173,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.