Hyperthermic critically ill patients are commonly cooled to reduce their oxygen consumption (VO2). However, no previous studies in febrile humans have measured VO2 during cooling. We cooled 12 febrile, critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients while measuring VO2 and CO2 production (VCO2) by analysis of inspired and expired gases. All patients were mechanically ventilated for hypoxemic, hypercapneic, or shock-related respiratory failure and had a mean APACHE II score of 22.4 +/- 7.7. As temperature was reduced from 39.4 +/- 0.8 to 37.0 +/- 0.5 degrees C, VO2 decreased from 359.0 +/- 65.0 to 295.1 +/- 57.3 ml/min (p < 0.01) and VCO2 decreased from 303.6 +/- 43.6 to 243.5 +/- 37.3 ml/min (p < 0.01). The respiratory quotient (RQ) did not change significantly, and calculated energy expenditure decreased from 2,481 +/- 426 to 1,990 +/- 33 kcal/day (p < 0.01). In 7 patients with right heart catheters, cardiac output decreased from 8.4 +/- 3.2 to 6.5 +/- 1.8 L/min (p < 0.01) as the oxygen extraction fraction also tended to decrease from a mean of 28.2 +/- 6.8 to 23.4 +/- 4.7% (p = 0.12) during cooling. Accordingly, cooling the febrile patient unloads the cardiorespiratory system and, in situations of limited oxygen delivery or hypoxemic respiratory failure, may thus facilitate resuscitation and minimize the potential for hypoxic tissue injury.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,100,427
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#5,423
of 15,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,305
of 110,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#28
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
