↓ Skip to main content

Eyes See Hazy while Algorithms Recognize Who You Are

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS), January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eyes See Hazy while Algorithms Recognize Who You Are
Published in
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS), January 2024
DOI 10.1145/3632292
Authors

Yong Zeng, Jiale Liu, Tong Dong, Qingqi Pei, Jianfeng Ma, Yao Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,576,222
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS)
#15
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,941
of 349,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS)
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them