You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
差分プライバシー技術の法的課題—米国国勢調査における実用化を素材として—
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Information Network Law Review, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.34374/inlaw.22.0_1 |
| Authors |
小西 葉子, 芝池 亮弥, 鄭 舒元, 曹 洋, 吉川 正俊 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,840,332
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Information Network Law Review
#15
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,374
of 371,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Network Law Review
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.