↓ Skip to main content

Fluid effects in model granular flows

Overview of attention for article published in Granular Matter, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 151)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluid effects in model granular flows
Published in
Granular Matter, November 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10035-023-01365-4
Authors

Yuting Zhao, W. Andy Take, Roland Kaitna, Brian W. McArdell, Jim N. McElwaine, Elisabeth T. Bowman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,195,210
of 24,840,108 outputs
Outputs from Granular Matter
#44
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,253
of 203,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Granular Matter
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,840,108 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them