↓ Skip to main content

Testing a conservation compromise: No evidence that public wolf hunting in Slovakia reduced livestock losses

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 1,081)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
228 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing a conservation compromise: No evidence that public wolf hunting in Slovakia reduced livestock losses
Published in
Conservation Letters, November 2023
DOI 10.1111/conl.12994
Authors

Miroslav Kutal, Martin Duľa, Alisa Royer Selivanova, José Vicente López‐Bao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Environmental Science 5 19%
Unspecified 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#172,589
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#37
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,861
of 377,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.