↓ Skip to main content

A Functional Connection Between Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Orofacial Motor Cortex in Human

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Functional Connection Between Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Orofacial Motor Cortex in Human
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, March 2004
DOI 10.1152/jn.00609.2003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) of humans is known to play a critical role in speech production. The IFG is a highly convoluted and cytoarchitectonically diverse structure, classically forming 3 subgyri. It is reasonable to speculate that during speaking the IFG, or some portion of it, influences by corticocortical connections the orofacial representational area of primary motor cortex. To test the hypothesis that such corticocortical connections exist, electrical-stimulation tract tracing experiments were performed intraoperatively on 14 human subjects undergoing surgical treatment of medically intractable epilepsy. Bipolar electrical stimulation was applied to sites on the IFG, while the resulting evoked potentials were recorded from orofacial motor cortex, using a multichannel recording array. Stimulation of the IFG evoked polyphasic waveforms on motor cortex of both language-dominant and -nondominant hemispheres. The evoked waveforms had consistent features across subjects. The responses were seen in discrete regions on precentral cortex. Stimulation of motor cortex also evoked responses on portions of IFG. The data provide evidence for a functional connection between the human IFG and orofacial motor cortex.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
United States 3 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
China 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 83 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 13%
Other 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 18%
Neuroscience 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Linguistics 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,655,679
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#465
of 8,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,014
of 65,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.