↓ Skip to main content

The Persistence of Segregation in the 21st Century Metropolis

Overview of attention for article published in City & Community, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 428)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
reddit
4 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Persistence of Segregation in the 21st Century Metropolis
Published in
City & Community, June 2013
DOI 10.1111/cico.12021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The traditional black-white color line in the American metropolis is being replaced by a more complex pattern of color lines involving multiple groups with different racial and ethnic origins. The consequences are positive in some respects, but they do not overcome the continuing barriers to equal opportunity. The degree of segregation has receded from the near-apartheid that was created in the black ghettos of Northern cities in the middle decades of the last century. Yet the experience of segregation continues to impact blacks of all economic classes. Today's color lines also involve Hispanics and Asians. The multiethnic metropolis is fostering a degree of neighborhood diversity that used to be quite rare. At the same time all-minority areas, now including blacks, Hispanics, and sometimes Asians, continue to be reproduced, and the disparities in community resources between white and minority neighborhoods remain deeply entrenched.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 14%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Master 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 104 65%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 24 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#618,583
of 34,540,392 outputs
Outputs from City & Community
#17
of 428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,749
of 240,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from City & Community
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,540,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.