↓ Skip to main content

Making Things Happen Through Challenging Goals: Leader Proactivity, Trust, and Business-Unit Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Making Things Happen Through Challenging Goals: Leader Proactivity, Trust, and Business-Unit Performance
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.1037/a0031807
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Building on decades of research on the proactivity of individual performers, this study integrates research on goal setting and trust in leadership to examine manager proactivity and business unit sales performance in one of the largest sales organizations in the United States. Results of a moderated-mediation model suggest that proactive senior managers establish more challenging goals for their business units (N = 50), which in turn are associated with higher sales performance. We further found that employees' trust in the manager is a critical contingency variable that facilitates the relationship between challenging sales goals and subsequent sales performance. This research contributes to growing literatures on trust in leadership and proactivity by studying their joint effects at a district-unit level of analysis while identifying district managers' tendency to set challenging goals as a process variable that helps translate their proactivity into the collective performance of their units.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Taiwan 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 294 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 24%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 11%
Researcher 19 6%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 71 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 121 38%
Psychology 55 17%
Social Sciences 27 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 78 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2026.
All research outputs
#1,415,599
of 30,073,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#463
of 3,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,347
of 310,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#10
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,073,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.